HomeDog ForumLog inRegister



Reminder

Dogtalk Calender 2013
has begun, so get your
pics up there in the competition
 thread,


 

GET VOTING FOR THIS MONTHS COMPETITIONS
 
KEEP ENTERING EVERYONE

and a big well done to sue for her piccie that won last months prize competition

Yer gotta be innit
to winnit

 




Similar topics
  • » Saginaw Breed Specific Legislation
  • » ROYAL CANIN BREED SPECIFIC !!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • » Can we do a virtual 'breed' specific show please mods?
  • » DEED NOT BREED
  • » Locally breed Red Kujaku ???
  • » Biewer A'La Pom Pon Breed Standard
  • » Barney~~ X breed Pup
  • » New Wild Pigeon Breed Found
  • » The GSA breed standards
  • » Toby~~ 18 month old Cross breed boy
  • Latest topics
    » Quizzes please respond!
    Today at 3:30 pm by Sandra

    » Sandra
    Today at 3:03 pm by Sandra

    » Issie is 6months
    Today at 11:37 am by hilary bradshaw

    » Poor baby
    Today at 11:32 am by hilary bradshaw

    » HAPPY BIRTHDAY
    Today at 10:26 am by Lainee

    » Sunday
    Today at 10:25 am by Lainee

    » Missing Mickey
    Yesterday at 7:47 pm by BrenA

    » Dunfermline
    Yesterday at 6:18 pm by Sandra

    » Vote for down dogs
    Yesterday at 6:17 pm by Judes

    » Vote for April Calendar pic
    Yesterday at 6:16 pm by Judes

    » Anyone watching Planet Earth?
    Yesterday at 6:16 pm by Sandra

    » Oops!
    Yesterday at 6:09 pm by Sandra

    » the winner of March calendar pic is........
    Yesterday at 2:07 pm by katrinbellyeu

    » Where are you all!
    Mon May 21, 2012 8:32 pm by SuzieB

    » update at the mad house
    Mon May 21, 2012 9:31 am by Lorz

    » how possessive is your dog.......
    Sat May 19, 2012 6:56 pm by Lainee

    Congratulations

    WELL DONE TO ALL THE DOGS WHO WON THEMSELVES A PLACE ON THE DOGTALK 2012 CALENDER.......... NEXT YEARS CALENDER COMPETITION HAS ALREADY STARTED, SO GET YOUR ENTRIES IN!!!....... WELL DONE BREN AND MICKEY FOR WINNING MR JANUARY 2013.......... COMPETITIONS ARE RUN EVERY MONTH...... . GET POSTING YOUR PICTURES
    BUBBLES
    Bubbles Has Been Moved
    To THE New Games
    Section, Under
    Shelley's Loose Lips
    xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Who is online?
    In total there are 12 users online :: 3 Registered, 0 Hidden and 9 Guests :: 1 Bot

    jacobrad, Judes, Sandra

    Most users ever online was 71 on Tue Feb 01, 2011 4:02 pm
    May 2012
    MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031   
    CalendarCalendar
    Top posters
    fredsmum
     
    Sandra
     
    liverbird
     
    Judes
     
    GR8GSD
     
    SUMMER
     
    Paula
     
    BrenA
     
    slynico
     
    Lainee
     
    Statistics
    We have 430 registered users
    The newest registered user is glenbo

    Our users have posted a total of 135729 messages in 9250 subjects

    Share | 
     

     Breed specific legislation – shouldn’t we punish the deed, not the breed?

    View previous topic View next topic Go down 
    AuthorMessage
    Paula



    Female
    Number of posts: 5645
    Age: 34
    Location: Derby UK
    Rep: 4
    Points: 4531
    Registration date: 2008-12-28

    PostSubject: Breed specific legislation – shouldn’t we punish the deed, not the breed?   Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:05 pm

    http://www.dogstrust.org.uk/information/poppysopinions/breedspecificlegislation/


    Did you know that if I was a certain dog breed I would be illegal in the UK? If I was a pit bull type, Fila Brasiliero, Dogo Argentino or Japanese Tosa, the police could seize me and put me to sleep just for being me, – even if I hadn’t done anything to deserve it. These breeds have been banned by the Dangerous Dogs Act (1991) – a very unfair law. It wouldn’t matter if I was the nicest, friendliest dog in the entire universe without an aggressive bone in my body – they could kill me just for being born one of these breeds, or for being imported into the country.
    Dog experts generally accept that the environment (i.e. the way a dog is brought up and the conditions around it) probably has a greater effect on the temperament and behaviour of a dog than his genetic make-up, or breed. Put simply, the way a dog is brought up, socialised and trained, exposed to punishment or praise and generally treated etc has much more to do with how aggressive he/she may turn out to be, than his actual breeding. It may be true to say that some breeds can be more easily trained than others to be aggressive towards people (inadvertently or on purpose), but this doesn’t mean that we can assume that every individual of that breed will turn out to be like that.
    The Dangerous Dogs Act (DDA) was introduced very quickly in 1991 following a spate of high-profile, headline-grabbing dog attacks on children. At first the media concentrated on the Rottweiler and German Shepherd Dog – although neither breeds ended up being banned. Later the pit bull became the centre of media attention; used for illegal dog fighting, as well as a family pet. The pit bull is one of the most popular breed types in the USA and the majority live as cherished family pets, so why was the pit bull (and three other breeds with few, if any, individuals in the country) singled out in this country?
    One of the problems with pit bull types is the fact that their jaws and facial muscles are so strong that they do a lot more damage when they attack than other breeds. Actually, you’re far more likely to get bitten by a crossbreed or a dog you know than a pit bull type, but the damage caused is usually relatively minor and so we don’t hear about it. The media also love the whole ‘devil dog’ or ‘hound from hell’ image, which is so much more shocking to the public; a big, strong dog provides a better story and photo-opportunity than, say, a small lap-dog!
    The DDA is unfair because it assumes that any dog suspected of being a pit bull type is guilty and it is up to the owners to disprove this; a case of “guilty till proven innocent”. The Pit Bull Terrier is not a Kennel Club recognised breed, so without an ‘official’ pedigree and breed standard it is difficult to prove or disprove that a dog is a pit bull, and how do you prove the parentage of a crossbreed dog? Many innocent crossbreeds, as well as purebred Kennel Club Registered Staffordshire Bull Terriers were taken away and destroyed or held by the police in secret kennels for long periods of time (even years) just for looking like a pit bull type. What makes it worse is that the description of the breed type used by police and ‘experts’ is so vague that many smooth-coated, muscular breeds of dog would fit most of it!
    Surely every dog should be judged on his/her own behaviour, rather than his heritage or the way that he looks? After all, traditionally ‘gentle’ or ‘solid’ temperament dog breeds can be aggressive and attack humans if they’ve been badly bred, had the wrong upbringing with little or no socialisation, been treated badly, are provoked, are in pain or through irresponsible actions of the owner.

    I really do think that dogs should be judged on their actions and not on their genes.
    Do you agree with me? My question to you is, is breed-specific legislation (i.e. laws which ban certain breeds) sensible, or should the law be changed so that all types and breeds of dogs are allowed, but each individual dog is judged just by how he or she acts?
    Please email me and let me know!
    Until next time, when I'll be barking on about another hot hound topic,
    Best woofishes,


    click the link to read feedback on this article.
    Back to top Go down
    GR8GSD



    Number of posts: 7339
    Location: happy land
    Rep: 15
    Points: 6433
    Registration date: 2008-12-28

    PostSubject: Re: Breed specific legislation – shouldn’t we punish the deed, not the breed?   Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:14 pm

    i cant stand BSL its bull shit and should be stopped as the DDA is a load of crap anyway lol

    i will comment on this in the morn wen im in a better frame of mind lol

    but good reading hun xxx
    Back to top Go down
    Paula



    Female
    Number of posts: 5645
    Age: 34
    Location: Derby UK
    Rep: 4
    Points: 4531
    Registration date: 2008-12-28

    PostSubject: Re: Breed specific legislation – shouldn’t we punish the deed, not the breed?   Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:14 pm

    :san53:
    Back to top Go down
     

    Breed specific legislation – shouldn’t we punish the deed, not the breed?

    View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
    Page 1 of 1

     Similar topics

    -
    » This section is for items specific to the Westfield Rd site.
    » END BREED SPECIFIC LEGISLATION IN AUSTRALIA
    » How long after seperating can I breed my female Emp?
    » Health Insurance for my Pug
    » Large Breed Dog Rescue

    Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
     :: Info, news and Interests :: Read All About it :: In the news-